everyone knows anyone can be made a leader. simply give that person a title and that's it. he or she now has the final say over matters. question is, how do you then elect a leader? what criteria are needed? performance? character? or both? or some other qualities? and who is to judge then?
"status doesn't give you everything" - tuesdays with morrie - an inspirational book, teaches you how to be strong and stay true to yourself. it's very true, very very true...
what happens when you are challenged? how would you react? what would you do? do you go all out to trash your challenger? would you consider the consequences?
i think i might have taken matters too seriously. well, this a blog, not a diary. i've a responsibility over what i say down here.
i've just a few words to some of you: 'have the guts to admit your inadequacies; don't assume, it only makes an ass out of you and (me or the subject(s))'. thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment